City of Santa Fe Ethics and Campaign Review Board met April 19.
Here is the agenda provided by the board:
Viewing: Members of the public may stream the meeting live on the City of Santa Fe’s YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/cityofsantafe. The YouTube live stream can be accessed at this address from most smartphones, tablets, or computers.
Written Public Comment: Members of the public may submit written comments on legislation by clicking on the comment bubble to the right of the meeting on the public portal at https://santafe.primegov.com/public/portal three hours prior to the start of the meeting.
The agenda and packet for the meeting will be posted at https://santafe.primegov.com/public/portal.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Request for Approval of the December 14, 2023 Ethics and Campaign Review Board Minutes. (Geralyn Cardenas, Interim City Clerk; gfcardenas@santafenm.gov)
6. PRESENTATION
a. Introduction of New Members
• Christina Brennan
• Jose Puentes
• Andrew Black
7. DISCUSSION AGENDA AND POSSIBLE ACTION
a. Case #2023-3. Complaint Brought Forward by Arcy Baca – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts Which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)
1. Discussion of Actions.
2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation.
3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16
b. Case #2024-1. Complaint Brought Forward by Stefanie Beninato – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts Which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)
1. Discussion of Actions.
2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation.
3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16
c. Case #2024-2. Complaint Brought Forward by Stefanie Beninato – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts Which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)
1. Discussion of Actions.
2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation.
3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16
d. Case #2023-5. Complaint Brought Forward by Pilar Faulkner – Status Report and Motion to Extend the Time for Final Investigation Report to the Board.
e. Appointments to the Independent Salary Commission
8. MATTERS FROM STAFF
9. MATTERS FROM THE COMMITTEE
10. MATTERS FROM THE CHAIR
11. PUBLIC COMMENT
12. NEXT MEETING: No Meeting Scheduled 13. ADJOURN
https://santafe.primegov.com/public/portal
