City of Santa Fe Ethics and Campaign Review Board met Dec. 14.
Here is the agenda provided by the board:
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5. DISCUSSION AGENDA AND POSSIBLE ACTION
a. Appointment of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson
b. Case #2023-2. Complaint Brought Forward by Arcy Baca – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts Which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)
1. Discussion of Actions.
2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation.
3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16
c. Case #2023-3. Complaint Brought Forward by Arcy Baca – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts Which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)
1. Discussion of Actions.
2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation.
3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16
d. Case #2023-4. Complaint Brought Forward by Arcy Baca – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts Which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)
1. Discussion of Actions.
2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation.
3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16
e. Case #2023-5. Complaint Brought Forward by Pilar Faulkner – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts Which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)
1. Discussion of Actions.
2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe There Was a Violation.
3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16
6. MATTERS FROM STAFF
7. MATTERS FROM THE COMMITTEE
8. MATTERS FROM THE CHAIR
9. NEXT MEETING: No Meeting Scheduled
10. ADJOURN
https://santafe.primegov.com/public/portal
